Mitsubishi Outlander GN vs Nissan X-Trail T33: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mitsubishi · 2021–present

Outlander GN

C PI 495

Version (7 versions)

Power: 188 kW256 PS
0–100 km/h: -
Top speed: -
Kerb mass: 2,179 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: LuvsMG481 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Nissan · 2020–present

X-Trail T33

C PI 478

Version (3 versions)

Power: 150 kW204 PS
0–100 km/h: 8.0 s
Top speed: 170 km/h
Kerb mass: 1,664 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: Harvey Bold / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Outlander GN 2 X-Trail T33 1

City Too close to call Length: 4,709 mm vs 4,680 mm
Performance X-Trail T33 Power per tonne: 90 kW/t vs 86 kW/t
Running costs Outlander GN Fuel per year: €210 vs €1,650 (estimated)
Off-road Outlander GN Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Mitsubishi Outlander GN has more power: 188 kW (256 PS) against 150 kW (204 PS) for Nissan X-Trail T33. Mitsubishi Outlander GN is 29 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail T33 (4,709 mm vs 4,680 mm). Nissan X-Trail T33 is lighter by 515 kg (1,664 kg vs 2,179 kg). At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €210 (Mitsubishi Outlander GN), €1,650 (Nissan X-Trail T33) (estimated). Nissan X-Trail T33 is the older design (from 2020); Mitsubishi Outlander GN arrived in 2021. On the catalog figures, the Nissan X-Trail T33 is the pick for performance; the Mitsubishi Outlander GN is the pick for running costs and off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Mitsubishi Outlander GN yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
Stat	Outlander GN	X-Trail T33
PI	C · 495	C · 478
Power	45	47
Grip	40	38
Handling	38	49
Top speed	47	27
Launch	49	42

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

1 Outlander GN2.4 PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 188 kW (256 PS) 14.93 sat 145 km/h
2 X-Trail T33e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS) 15.96 sat 138 km/h · +1.03 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

Outlander GN · X-Trail T33

	Outlander GN	X-Trail T33
Length	4,709 mm185.4 in †	4,680 mm184.3 in −29 mm −1.1 in −0.6%
Width	1,897 mm74.7 in †	1,840 mm72.4 in −57 mm −2.2 in −3.0%
Height	1,745 mm68.7 in †	1,720 mm67.7 in −25 mm −1.0 in −1.4%
Wheelbase	2,705 mm106.5 in †	2,705 mm106.5 in
Kerb weight	2,179 kg4,804 lb	1,664 kg3,668 lb −515 kg −1,135 lb −23.6%
Fits a standard garage?	Tight	Yes

Difference vs Outlander GN (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

General
	Mitsubishi Outlander GN	Nissan X-Trail T33
Version	2.4 PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 188 kW (256 PS)	e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS)
Production years	2021–present	2020–present
Body	SUV	SUV
Class	SUV / crossover	SUV / crossover
Country	Japan	Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	188 kW (256 PS) 252 hp Better	150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp
Power, all versions	120–225 kW (163–306 PS) 161–302 hp	120–157 kW (163–213 PS) 161–211 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills.	450 Nm 332 lb-ft Better	330 Nm 243 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads.	No data	8.0 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it.	No data	170 km/h 106 mph
Power per tonne	86 kW/t 105 hp/ton calculated	90 kW/t 110 hp/ton calculated Better
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Plug-in hybrid	Hybrid
Engine	2,360 cc · 4 cyl 2.4 l	1,500 cc 1.5 l
Engine code	4B12	No data
Gearbox	No data	1-speed single-speed
Drive	All-wheel drive	Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length	4,709 mm 185.4 in †	4,680 mm 184.3 in
Width	1,897 mm 74.7 in †	1,840 mm 72.4 in
Height	1,745 mm 68.7 in †	1,720 mm 67.7 in
Wheelbase	2,705 mm 106.5 in †	2,705 mm 106.5 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy.	2,179 kg 4,804 lb	1,664 kg 3,668 lb Better
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram.	No data	560 l 19.8 cu ft
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip.	0.8 l/100 km 294.0 mpg US Better	6.3 l/100 km 37.3 mpg US
CO₂	19 g/km Better	143 g/km
Fuel cost per year	€210/year estimated Better	€1,650/year estimated
Electric
Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully.	20 kWh	No data
Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys.	87 km 54 mi	No data
Energy use	23.4 kWh/100 km	No data
Safety
Euro NCAP	No data	★★★★★ (2021)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.