Daewoo Nexia vs Lada VAZ-2110: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Daewoo · 1994–2016
Nexia
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,025 kg
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Lada · 1995–2007
VAZ-2110
- Power
- 52 kW71 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Dmitry Terekhov / Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Nexia 1 VAZ-2110 1
- Family Nexia Boot: 530 l vs 416 l
- City VAZ-2110 Length: 4,265 mm vs 4,482 mm
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Sedan vs Front-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Daewoo Nexia has more power: 55 kW (75 PS) against 52 kW (71 PS) for Lada VAZ-2110. Daewoo Nexia is 217 mm longer than Lada VAZ-2110 (4,482 mm vs 4,265 mm). Daewoo Nexia has the bigger boot: 530 l against 416 l. Daewoo Nexia is the older design (from 1994); Lada VAZ-2110 arrived in 1995. On the catalog figures, the Daewoo Nexia is the pick for family; the Lada VAZ-2110 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Lada VAZ-2110 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Nexia | VAZ-2110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,482 mm176.5 in | 4,265 mm167.9 in −217 mm −8.5 in −4.8% |
| Boot | 530 l18.7 cu ft | 416 l14.7 cu ft −114 l −4.0 cu ft −21.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs Nexia (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Daewoo Nexia | Lada VAZ-2110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 G15MF · 55 kW (75 PS) | 1.5 · 52 kW (71 PS) |
| Production years | 1994–2016 | 1995–2007 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Uzbekistan | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp Better | 52 kW (71 PS) 70 hp |
| Power, all versions | 55–80 kW (75–109 PS) 74–107 hp | 52–67 kW (71–91 PS) 70–90 hp |
| Power per tonne | 54 kW/t 65 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc 1.5 l | 1,500 cc 1.5 l |
| Engine code | G15MF | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,482 mm 176.5 in | 4,265 mm 167.9 in |
| Width | 1,662 mm 65.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,393 mm 54.8 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,520 mm 99.2 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,025 kg 2,260 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 530 l 18.7 cu ft Better | 416 l 14.7 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 7.5 l/100 km 31.4 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,970/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Fuel, Engine, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.