Volkswagen ID.3 I vs Skoda Elroq I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Volkswagen · 2019–present
ID.3 I
- Power
- 150 kW204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.9 s
- Top speed
- 180 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,928 kg
Skoda · 2025–present
Elroq I
- Power
- 125 kW170 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.0 s
- Top speed
- 160 km/h
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: ID.3 I 3 Elroq I 2
- Family Elroq I Boot: 470 l vs 385 l
- City ID.3 I Length: 4,262 mm vs 4,488 mm; Width: 1,809 mm vs 1,884 mm
- Long trips ID.3 I Range: 548 km vs 375 km (estimated)
- Performance ID.3 I 0–100 km/h: 7.9 s vs 9.0 s
- Off-road Elroq I Drive and body: Rear-wheel drive · Crossover vs Rear-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Volkswagen ID.3 I is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 7.9 s against 9.0 s for Skoda Elroq I. Skoda Elroq I is 226 mm longer than Volkswagen ID.3 I (4,488 mm vs 4,262 mm). Skoda Elroq I has the bigger boot: 470 l against 385 l. Volkswagen ID.3 I is the older design (from 2019); Skoda Elroq I arrived in 2025. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Elroq I is the pick for family and off-road; the Volkswagen ID.3 I is the pick for city, long trips and performance. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Skoda Elroq I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | ID.3 I | Elroq I |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 477 | C · 460 |
| Power | 42 | 35 |
| Grip | 35 | 43 |
| Handling | 56 | 62 |
| Top speed | 31 | 23 |
| Launch | 43 | 37 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 ID.3 IPro S 77 kWh · electric · 150 kW (204 PS) 15.80 sat 139 km/h
- 2 Elroq I50 · electric · 125 kW (170 PS) 16.51 sat 130 km/h · +0.71 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| ID.3 I | Elroq I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,262 mm167.8 in | 4,488 mm176.7 in +226 mm +8.9 in +5.3% |
| Width | 1,809 mm71.2 in | 1,884 mm74.2 in +75 mm +3.0 in +4.1% |
| Height | 1,552 mm61.1 in | 1,625 mm64.0 in +73 mm +2.9 in +4.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,770 mm109.1 in | 2,765 mm108.9 in −5 mm −0.2 in −0.2% |
| Boot | 385 l13.6 cu ft | 470 l16.6 cu ft +85 l +3.0 cu ft +22.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Tight |
Difference vs ID.3 I (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen ID.3 I | Skoda Elroq I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Pro S 77 kWh · electric · 150 kW (204 PS) | 50 · electric · 125 kW (170 PS) |
| Production years | 2019–present | 2025–present |
| Body | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | Czech Republic |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp Better | 125 kW (170 PS) 168 hp |
| Power, all versions | 110–240 kW (150–326 PS) 148–322 hp | 125–250 kW (170–340 PS) 168–335 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.9 s Better | 9.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 180 km/h 112 mph Better | 160 km/h 99 mph |
| Power per tonne | 78 kW/t 95 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Electric | Electric |
| Gearbox | 1-speed single-speed | single-speed |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,262 mm 167.8 in | 4,488 mm 176.7 in |
| Width | 1,809 mm 71.2 in | 1,884 mm 74.2 in |
| Height | 1,552 mm 61.1 in | 1,625 mm 64.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,770 mm 109.1 in | 2,765 mm 108.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 385 l 13.6 cu ft | 470 l 16.6 cu ft Better |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel cost per year | €690/year estimated | No data |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | 77 kWh Better | 52 kWh |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | 548 km 341 mi Better | 375 km 233 mi |
| Energy use | 15.4 kWh/100 km | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2020) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €0.30/kWh electricity.