Dacia Logan III vs Dacia Bigster R1310: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Dacia · 2020–present
Logan III
- Power
- 48 kW65 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,088 kg

Dacia · 2024–present
Bigster R1310
- Power
- 116 kW158 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.7 s
- Top speed
- 180 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,494 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Logan III 0 Bigster R1310 4
- Family Bigster R1310 Boot: 546 l vs 528 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,396 mm vs 4,570 mm
- Performance Bigster R1310 Power per tonne: 78 kW/t vs 44 kW/t
- Running costs Bigster R1310 Fuel per year: €1,230 vs €1,370 (estimated)
- Off-road Bigster R1310 Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Dacia Bigster R1310 has more power: 116 kW (158 PS) against 48 kW (65 PS) for Dacia Logan III. Dacia Bigster R1310 is 174 mm longer than Dacia Logan III (4,570 mm vs 4,396 mm). Dacia Logan III is lighter by 406 kg (1,088 kg vs 1,494 kg). Dacia Bigster R1310 has the bigger boot: 546 l against 528 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,370 (Dacia Logan III), €1,230 (Dacia Bigster R1310) (estimated). Dacia Logan III is the older design (from 2020); Dacia Bigster R1310 arrived in 2024. On the catalog figures, the Dacia Bigster R1310 is the pick for family, performance, running costs and off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Dacia Logan III yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Logan III | Bigster R1310 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 402 | C · 450 |
| Power | 25 | 42 |
| Grip | 40 | 32 |
| Handling | 70 | 52 |
| Top speed | 23 | 31 |
| Launch | 14 | 33 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Bigster R1310Hybrid 155 · 116 kW (158 PS) 17.02 sat 129 km/h
- 2 Logan IIISCe 65 · petrol · 48 kW (65 PS) 19.22 sat 111 km/h · +2.20 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Logan III | Bigster R1310 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,396 mm173.1 in | 4,570 mm179.9 in +174 mm +6.9 in +4.0% |
| Width | 1,848 mm72.8 in | 1,813 mm71.4 in −35 mm −1.4 in −1.9% |
| Height | 1,501 mm59.1 in | 1,712 mm67.4 in +211 mm +8.3 in +14.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm104.3 in | 2,702 mm106.4 in +53 mm +2.1 in +2.0% |
| Kerb weight | 1,088 kg2,399 lb | 1,494 kg3,294 lb +406 kg +895 lb +37.3% |
| Boot | 528 l18.6 cu ft | 546 l19.3 cu ft +18 l +0.6 cu ft +3.4% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Logan III (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Dacia Logan III | Dacia Bigster R1310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | SCe 65 · petrol · 48 kW (65 PS) | Hybrid 155 · 116 kW (158 PS) |
| Production years | 2020–present | 2024–present |
| Body | Sedan | SUV |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Romania | Romania |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 48 kW (65 PS) 64 hp | 116 kW (158 PS) 156 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 48–74 kW (65–101 PS) 64–99 hp | 96–116 kW (131–158 PS) 129–156 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 95 Nm 70 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 9.7 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 180 km/h 112 mph |
| Power per tonne | 44 kW/t 54 hp/ton calculated | 78 kW/t 94 hp/ton calculated Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Hybrid |
| Engine | 999 cc · 3 cyl 1.0 l | 4 cyl |
| Engine code | B4D | H5P A2 |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,396 mm 173.1 in | 4,570 mm 179.9 in |
| Width | 1,848 mm 72.8 in | 1,813 mm 71.4 in |
| Height | 1,501 mm 59.1 in | 1,712 mm 67.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm 104.3 in | 2,702 mm 106.4 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,088 kg 2,399 lb Better | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 528 l 18.6 cu ft | 546 l 19.3 cu ft Better |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 50 l 13.2 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.2 l/100 km 45.2 mpg US | 4.7 l/100 km 50.0 mpg US Better |
| CO₂ | 118 g/km | 106 g/km Better |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,370/year estimated | €1,230/year estimated Better |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 1,064 km 661 mi estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★☆☆☆ (2021) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.