Toyota Aygo II vs Toyota Aygo AB70: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Toyota · 2014–2022
Aygo II
- Power
- 51 kW69 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 13.0 s
- Top speed
- 160 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 840 kg
Toyota · 2022–present
Aygo AB70
- Power
- 53 kW72 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 14.9 s
- Top speed
- 158 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,024 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Aygo II 3 Aygo AB70 1
- City Aygo II Length: 3,455 mm vs 3,700 mm; Width: 1,615 mm vs 1,740 mm
- Performance Aygo II Power per tonne: 61 kW/t vs 52 kW/t; 0–100 km/h: 13.0 s vs 14.9 s
- Running costs Aygo II Fuel per year: €1,080 vs €1,260 (estimated)
- Off-road Aygo AB70 Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Crossover vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Toyota Aygo II is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 13.0 s against 14.9 s for Toyota Aygo AB70. Toyota Aygo AB70 is 245 mm longer than Toyota Aygo II (3,700 mm vs 3,455 mm). Toyota Aygo II is lighter by 184 kg (840 kg vs 1,024 kg). At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,080 (Toyota Aygo II), €1,260 (Toyota Aygo AB70) (estimated). Toyota Aygo II is the older design (from 2014); Toyota Aygo AB70 arrived in 2022. Toyota Aygo AB70 is still in production; Toyota Aygo II is not. On the catalog figures, the Toyota Aygo II is the pick for city, performance and running costs; the Toyota Aygo AB70 is the pick for off-road.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Aygo II | Aygo AB70 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 439 | C · 415 |
| Power | 34 | 30 |
| Grip | 40 | 40 |
| Handling | 71 | 70 |
| Top speed | 23 | 22 |
| Launch | 20 | 14 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Aygo II1.0 VVT-i · petrol · 51 kW (69 PS) 18.59 sat 115 km/h
- 2 Aygo AB701.0 VVT-i · petrol · 53 kW (72 PS) 19.32 sat 110 km/h · +0.73 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Aygo II | Aygo AB70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3,455 mm136.0 in | 3,700 mm145.7 in +245 mm +9.6 in +7.1% |
| Width | 1,615 mm63.6 in | 1,740 mm68.5 in +125 mm +4.9 in +7.7% |
| Height | 1,460 mm57.5 in | 1,525 mm60.0 in +65 mm +2.6 in +4.5% |
| Kerb weight | 840 kg1,852 lb | 1,024 kg2,258 lb +184 kg +406 lb +21.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Aygo II (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Toyota Aygo II | Toyota Aygo AB70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.0 VVT-i · petrol · 51 kW (69 PS) | 1.0 VVT-i · petrol · 53 kW (72 PS) |
| Production years | 2014–2022 | 2022–present |
| Body | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Class | A-segment (city car) | A-segment (city car) |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 51 kW (69 PS) 68 hp | 53 kW (72 PS) 71 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 51–53 kW (69–72 PS) 68–71 hp | 53–85 kW (72–116 PS) 71–114 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 95 Nm 70 lb-ft | 93 Nm 69 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 13.0 s Better | 14.9 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
| Power per tonne | 61 kW/t 74 hp/ton calculated Better | 52 kW/t 63 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 998 cc · 3 cyl 1.0 l | 998 cc · 3 cyl 1.0 l |
| Engine code | 1KR-FE | 1KR-B52 |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 3,455 mm 136.0 in | 3,700 mm 145.7 in |
| Width | 1,615 mm 63.6 in | 1,740 mm 68.5 in |
| Height | 1,460 mm 57.5 in | 1,525 mm 60.0 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,430 mm 95.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 840 kg 1,852 lb Better | 1,024 kg 2,258 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 231 l 8.2 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 4.1 l/100 km 57.4 mpg US Better | 4.8 l/100 km 49.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | 90 g/km Better | 109 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,080/year estimated Better | €1,260/year estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2014) | ★★★★☆ (2025) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (6): Class, Country, Fuel, Engine, Gearbox, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.