BMW X5 G05 vs Ineos Grenadier I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
BMW · 2018–2026
X5 G05
- Power
- 390 kW530 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 4.3 s
- Kerb mass
- 3,275 kg
Ineos · 2022–present
Grenadier I
- Power
- 210 kW286 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Grenadier I Drive and body: Four-wheel drive (4×4) · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
BMW X5 G05 has more power: 390 kW (530 PS) against 210 kW (286 PS) for Ineos Grenadier I. BMW X5 G05 is the older design (from 2018); Ineos Grenadier I arrived in 2022. Ineos Grenadier I is still in production; BMW X5 G05 is not. On the catalog figures, the Ineos Grenadier I is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Ineos Grenadier I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| BMW X5 G05 | Ineos Grenadier I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | M50i · petrol · 390 kW (530 PS) | 3.0 petrol (B58) · 210 kW (286 PS) |
| Production years | 2018–2026 | 2022–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | United Kingdom |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 390 kW (530 PS) 523 hp Better | 210 kW (286 PS) 282 hp |
| Power, all versions | 195–460 kW (265–625 PS) 261–617 hp | 183–210 kW (249–286 PS) 245–282 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft Better | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 4.3 s | No data |
| Power per tonne | 119 kW/t 145 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 4,400 cc · 8 cyl 4.4 l | 6 cyl |
| Engine code | N63 | B58 |
| Gearbox | automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Four-wheel drive (4×4) |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,935 mm 194.3 in | No data |
| Width | 2,004 mm 78.9 in | No data |
| Height | 1,765 mm 69.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm 117.1 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 3,275 kg 7,220 lb | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 14.4 l/100 km 16.3 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 329 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €3,780/year estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2018) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.