BMW X5 F15 vs BMW X5 G05: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

BMW · 2013–2018
X5 F15
- Power
- 160 kW218 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 8.2 s
- Top speed
- 220 km/h
- Kerb mass
- -

BMW · 2018–2026
X5 G05
- Power
- 390 kW530 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 4.3 s
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 3,275 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: X5 F15 1 X5 G05 1
- City X5 F15 Width: 1,938 mm vs 2,004 mm
- Performance X5 G05 0–100 km/h: 4.3 s vs 8.2 s
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
BMW X5 G05 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 4.3 s against 8.2 s for BMW X5 F15. BMW X5 G05 is 49 mm longer than BMW X5 F15 (4,935 mm vs 4,886 mm). BMW X5 F15 is the older design (from 2013); BMW X5 G05 arrived in 2018. On the catalog figures, the BMW X5 F15 is the pick for city; the BMW X5 G05 is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the BMW X5 F15 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | X5 F15 | X5 G05 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | B · 504 | B · 547 |
| Power | 37 | 55 |
| Grip | 52 | 34 |
| Handling | 55 | 15 |
| Top speed | 46 | 75 |
| Launch | 41 | 71 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 X5 G05M50i · petrol · 390 kW (530 PS) 12.69 sat 175 km/h
- 2 X5 F15xDrive25d · diesel · 160 kW (218 PS) 15.82 sat 136 km/h · +3.13 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| X5 F15 | X5 G05 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,886 mm192.4 in | 4,935 mm194.3 in +49 mm +1.9 in +1.0% |
| Width | 1,938 mm76.3 in | 2,004 mm78.9 in +66 mm +2.6 in +3.4% |
| Height | 1,762 mm69.4 in | 1,765 mm69.5 in +3 mm +0.1 in +0.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,933 mm115.5 in | 2,975 mm117.1 in +42 mm +1.7 in +1.4% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too wide | Too wide |
Difference vs X5 F15 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| BMW X5 F15 | BMW X5 G05 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | xDrive25d · diesel · 160 kW (218 PS) | M50i · petrol · 390 kW (530 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2018 | 2018–2026 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Country | Germany | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 160 kW (218 PS) 215 hp | 390 kW (530 PS) 523 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 160–423 kW (218–575 PS) 215–567 hp | 195–460 kW (265–625 PS) 261–617 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft Better |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 8.2 s | 4.3 s Better |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 220 km/h 137 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 119 kW/t 145 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l | 4,400 cc · 8 cyl 4.4 l |
| Engine code | N47 | N63 |
| Gearbox | automatic | automatic |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,886 mm 192.4 in | 4,935 mm 194.3 in |
| Width | 1,938 mm 76.3 in | 2,004 mm 78.9 in |
| Height | 1,762 mm 69.4 in | 1,765 mm 69.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933 mm 115.5 in | 2,975 mm 117.1 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 3,275 kg 7,220 lb |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 14.4 l/100 km 16.3 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 329 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €3,780/year estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2018) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Country, Gearbox, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.