Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Lifan X60 vs JAC S5: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Lifan X60

Lifan · 2011–2018

X60

C PI 416

Power
98 kW133 PS
0–100 km/h
11.2 s

JAC S5

JAC · 2013–2019

S5

Power
100 kW136 PS
0–100 km/h
-

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: X60 1 S5 1

  • Family S5 Boot: 500 l vs 405 l
  • City X60 Length: 4,325 mm vs 4,430 mm

In plain words

JAC S5 has more power: 100 kW (136 PS) against 98 kW (133 PS) for Lifan X60. JAC S5 is 105 mm longer than Lifan X60 (4,430 mm vs 4,325 mm). JAC S5 has the bigger boot: 500 l against 405 l. Lifan X60 is the older design (from 2011); JAC S5 arrived in 2013. On the catalog figures, the JAC S5 is the pick for family; the Lifan X60 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the JAC S5 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

X60 · S5
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,600 mmWheelbase 8 ft 6 inLength 4,325 mmLength 14 ft 2 in1,690 mm5 ft 7 inWheelbase 2,645 mmWheelbase 8 ft 8 inLength 4,430 mmLength 14 ft 6 in1,660 mm5 ft 5 in
X60S5
Length 4,325 mm170.3 in 4,430 mm174.4 in +105 mm +4.1 in +2.4%
Height 1,690 mm66.5 in 1,660 mm65.4 in −30 mm −1.2 in −1.8%
Wheelbase 2,600 mm102.4 in 2,645 mm104.1 in +45 mm +1.8 in +1.7%
Boot 405 l14.3 cu ft 500 l17.7 cu ft +95 l +3.4 cu ft +23.5%
Fits a standard garage? YesNo data

Difference vs X60 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Lifan X60JAC S5
General
Version 1.8 · petrol · 98 kW (133 PS) 2.0 · petrol · 100 kW (136 PS)
Production years 2011–2018 2013–2019
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country China China
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp
Power, all versions 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp 100–129 kW (136–175 PS) 134–173 hp
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 11.2 s No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 1,800 cc 1.8 l 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l
Drive Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,325 mm 170.3 in 4,430 mm 174.4 in
Width 1,790 mm 70.5 in No data
Height 1,690 mm 66.5 in 1,660 mm 65.4 in
Wheelbase 2,600 mm 102.4 in 2,645 mm 104.1 in
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 405 l 14.3 cu ft 500 l 17.7 cu ft Better
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 8.2 l/100 km 28.7 mpg US No data
Fuel cost per year €2,150/year estimated No data

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.