Renault Duster vs Lifan X60: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Renault · 2010
Duster
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -

Lifan · 2011–2018
X60
- Power
- 98 kW133 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.2 s
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Duster 1 X60 1
- City X60 Width: 1,790 mm vs 1,822 mm
- Off-road Duster Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Lifan X60 has more power: 98 kW (133 PS) against 84 kW (114 PS) for Renault Duster. Lifan X60 is 10 mm longer than Renault Duster (4,325 mm vs 4,315 mm). Renault Duster is the older design (from 2010); Lifan X60 arrived in 2011. Renault Duster is still in production; Lifan X60 is not. On the catalog figures, the Lifan X60 is the pick for city; the Renault Duster is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Renault Duster yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Duster | X60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,315 mm169.9 in | 4,325 mm170.3 in +10 mm +0.4 in +0.2% |
| Width | 1,822 mm71.7 in | 1,790 mm70.5 in −32 mm −1.3 in −1.8% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,690 mm66.5 in +65 mm +2.6 in +4.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm105.2 in | 2,600 mm102.4 in −73 mm −2.9 in −2.7% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Duster (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Duster | Lifan X60 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 16V (114 PS) · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 98 kW (133 PS) |
| Production years | 2010 | 2011–2018 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 11.2 s |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,315 mm 169.9 in | 4,325 mm 170.3 in |
| Width | 1,822 mm 71.7 in | 1,790 mm 70.5 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,690 mm 66.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm 105.2 in | 2,600 mm 102.4 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 405 l 14.3 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 8.2 l/100 km 28.7 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,150/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.