Renault Duster vs Chevrolet Niva: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Renault · 2010
Duster
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
- Kerb mass
- -

Chevrolet · 2002–2020
Niva
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,410 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Duster 0 Niva 1
- City Niva Length: 4,048 mm vs 4,315 mm; Width: 1,770 mm vs 1,822 mm
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Chevrolet Niva has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 84 kW (114 PS) for Renault Duster. Renault Duster is 267 mm longer than Chevrolet Niva (4,315 mm vs 4,048 mm). Chevrolet Niva is the older design (from 2002); Renault Duster arrived in 2010. Renault Duster is still in production; Chevrolet Niva is not. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Niva is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Renault Duster yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Duster | Niva | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,315 mm169.9 in | 4,048 mm159.4 in −267 mm −10.5 in −6.2% |
| Width | 1,822 mm71.7 in | 1,770 mm69.7 in −52 mm −2.0 in −2.9% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,652 mm65.0 in +27 mm +1.1 in +1.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm105.2 in | 2,450 mm96.5 in −223 mm −8.8 in −8.3% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Duster (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Duster | Chevrolet Niva | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 16V (114 PS) · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.8 Z18XE · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2010 | 2002–2020 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp | 59–90 kW (80–122 PS) 79–121 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 64 kW/t 78 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Engine code | No data | Z18XE |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,315 mm 169.9 in | 4,048 mm 159.4 in |
| Width | 1,822 mm 71.7 in | 1,770 mm 69.7 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,652 mm 65.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm 105.2 in | 2,450 mm 96.5 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 320 l 11.3 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).