Geely Emgrand X7 vs Lifan X60: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Geely · 2015
Emgrand X7
- Power
- 92 kW125 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Lifan · 2011–2018
X60
- Power
- 98 kW133 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.2 s
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Emgrand X7 2 X60 0
- Family Emgrand X7 Boot: 580 l vs 405 l
- Running costs Too close to call Fuel per year: €2,210 vs €2,150 (estimated)
- Off-road Emgrand X7 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Lifan X60 has more power: 98 kW (133 PS) against 92 kW (125 PS) for Geely Emgrand X7. Geely Emgrand X7 has the bigger boot: 580 l against 405 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,210 (Geely Emgrand X7), €2,150 (Lifan X60) (estimated). Lifan X60 is the older design (from 2011); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Geely Emgrand X7 is the pick for family and off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Geely Emgrand X7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Emgrand X7 | X60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 580 l20.5 cu ft | 405 l14.3 cu ft −175 l −6.2 cu ft −30.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Emgrand X7 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Geely Emgrand X7 | Lifan X60 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 92 kW (125 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 98 kW (133 PS) |
| Production years | 2015 | 2011–2018 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 92 kW (125 PS) 123 hp | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 11.2 s |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,325 mm 170.3 in |
| Width | No data | 1,790 mm 70.5 in |
| Height | No data | 1,690 mm 66.5 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,600 mm 102.4 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 580 l 20.5 cu ft Better | 405 l 14.3 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 8.4 l/100 km 28.0 mpg US | 8.2 l/100 km 28.7 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | €2,210/year estimated | €2,150/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.