GAZ Volga Siber vs Honda Accord: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
GAZ · 2008–2010
Volga Siber
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 105–107 kW143–145 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Honda · 2022–present
Accord XI
- Power
- 143 kW194 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,493 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Sedan vs Front-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Honda Accord is the older design (from 1976); GAZ Volga Siber arrived in 2008. Honda Accord is still in production; GAZ Volga Siber is not. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the GAZ Volga Siber yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| GAZ Volga Siber | Honda Accord | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | No data | Accord XI · 1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT · petrol · 143 kW (194 PS) |
| Production years | 2008–2010 | 2022–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | No data | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 105–107 kW (143–145 PS) 141–143 hp | 143 kW (194 PS) 192 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 105–107 kW (143–145 PS) 141–143 hp | 50–207 kW (68–281 PS) 67–278 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| Power per tonne | No data | 96 kW/t 117 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,498 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l |
| Gearbox | No data | CVT |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,971 mm 195.7 in |
| Height | No data | 1,449 mm 57.0 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,830 mm 111.4 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,493 kg 3,292 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 473 l 16.7 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 56 l 14.8 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 7.3 l/100 km 32.2 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,920/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 767 km 477 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.