Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Moskvich-2140 vs Audi 80: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Moskvich-2140

Moskvich · 1976–1988

Moskvich-2140

D PI 357

Power
55 kW75 PS
0–100 km/h
19.0 s
Top speed
142 km/h
Kerb mass
1,080 kg

Version spec sheet

Audi 80

Audi · 1991–1995

80 B4

B PI 513

Power
103 kW140 PS
0–100 km/h
9.6 s
Top speed
201 km/h
Kerb mass
-

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

  • Performance 80 B4 0–100 km/h: 9.6 s vs 19.0 s

In plain words

Audi 80 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 9.6 s against 19.0 s for Moskvich-2140. Audi 80 is the older design (from 1966); Moskvich-2140 arrived in 1976. On the catalog figures, the Audi 80 is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Audi 80 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatMoskvich-214080 B4
PID · 357B · 513
Power 14 33
Grip 43 57
Handling 76 75
Top speed 16 39
Launch 2 34
Reliability 63 81

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 80 B480 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) 16.69 sat 128 km/h
  2. 2 Moskvich-21401.5 · petrol 20.60 sat 102 km/h · +3.91 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Full specifications

Moskvich-2140Audi 80
General
Version 1.5 · petrol 80 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS)
Production years 1976–1988 1991–1995
Body Sedan Sedan, Station wagon
Country Soviet Union (USSR) Germany
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better
Power, all versions 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp 40–128 kW (54–174 PS) 54–172 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 181 Nm 133 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 19.0 s 9.6 s Better
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 142 km/h 88 mph 201 km/h 125 mph Better
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 1,478 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l
Engine code No data ACE
Drive Rear-wheel drive All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,250 mm 167.3 in No data
Width 1,550 mm 61.0 in No data
Height 1,480 mm 58.3 in No data
Wheelbase 2,400 mm 94.5 in No data
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,080 kg 2,381 lb No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 520 l 18.4 cu ft No data
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 46 l 12.2 gal US No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 10.2 l/100 km 23.1 mpg US No data
Fuel cost per year €2,680/year estimated No data
Range on a full tank 451 km 280 mi estimated No data

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.