Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Audi 80 vs Moskvich-2140: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Audi 80

Audi · 1991–1995

80 B4

B PI 513

Power
103 kW140 PS
0–100 km/h
9.6 s
Top speed
201 km/h
Kerb mass
-

Moskvich-2140

Moskvich · 1976–1988

Moskvich-2140

D PI 357

Power
55 kW75 PS
0–100 km/h
19.0 s
Top speed
142 km/h
Kerb mass
1,080 kg

Version spec sheet

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

  • Performance 80 B4 0–100 km/h: 9.6 s vs 19.0 s

In plain words

Audi 80 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 9.6 s against 19.0 s for Moskvich-2140. Audi 80 is the older design (from 1966); Moskvich-2140 arrived in 1976. On the catalog figures, the Audi 80 is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Audi 80 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
Stat80 B4Moskvich-2140
PIB · 513D · 357
Power 33 14
Grip 57 43
Handling 75 76
Top speed 39 16
Launch 34 2
Reliability 81 63

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 80 B480 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) 16.69 sat 128 km/h
  2. 2 Moskvich-21401.5 · petrol 20.60 sat 102 km/h · +3.91 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Full specifications

Audi 80Moskvich-2140
General
Version 80 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) 1.5 · petrol
Production years 1991–1995 1976–1988
Body Sedan, Station wagon Sedan
Country Germany Soviet Union (USSR)
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp
Power, all versions 40–128 kW (54–174 PS) 54–172 hp 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 181 Nm 133 lb-ft No data
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 9.6 s Better 19.0 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 201 km/h 125 mph Better 142 km/h 88 mph
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l 1,478 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l
Engine code ACE No data
Drive All-wheel drive Rear-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length No data 4,250 mm 167.3 in
Width No data 1,550 mm 61.0 in
Height No data 1,480 mm 58.3 in
Wheelbase No data 2,400 mm 94.5 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. No data 1,080 kg 2,381 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. No data 520 l 18.4 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. No data 46 l 12.2 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 10.2 l/100 km 23.1 mpg US
Fuel cost per year No data €2,680/year estimated
Range on a full tank No data 451 km 280 mi estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.