Honda Accord vs GAZ Volga Siber: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Honda · 2022–present
Accord XI
- Power
- 143 kW194 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,493 kg
GAZ · 2008–2010
Volga Siber
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 105–107 kW143–145 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Sedan vs Front-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Honda Accord is the older design (from 1976); GAZ Volga Siber arrived in 2008. Honda Accord is still in production; GAZ Volga Siber is not. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the GAZ Volga Siber yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Honda Accord | GAZ Volga Siber | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Accord XI · 1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT · petrol · 143 kW (194 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2022–present | 2008–2010 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Japan | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 143 kW (194 PS) 192 hp Better | 105–107 kW (143–145 PS) 141–143 hp |
| Power, all versions | 50–207 kW (68–281 PS) 67–278 hp | 105–107 kW (143–145 PS) 141–143 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | No data |
| Power per tonne | 96 kW/t 117 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,498 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l | No data |
| Gearbox | CVT | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,971 mm 195.7 in | No data |
| Height | 1,449 mm 57.0 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,830 mm 111.4 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,493 kg 3,292 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 473 l 16.7 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 56 l 14.8 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.3 l/100 km 32.2 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,920/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 767 km 477 mi estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.