Lada XRay vs Kia Rio X-Line: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: XRay 1 Rio X-Line 1
- Family Rio X-Line Boot: 390 l vs 376 l
- Off-road XRay Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Lada XRay has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 74 kW (101 PS) for Kia Rio X-Line. Kia Rio X-Line has the bigger boot: 390 l against 376 l. Lada XRay is the older design (from 2015); Kia Rio X-Line arrived in 2017. On the catalog figures, the Kia Rio X-Line is the pick for family; the Lada XRay is the pick for off-road.
Size and weight
| XRay | Rio X-Line | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 376 l13.3 cu ft | 390 l13.8 cu ft +14 l +0.5 cu ft +3.7% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs XRay (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada XRay | Kia Rio X-Line | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.8 · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) | 1.4 G4LC · 74 kW (101 PS) |
| Production years | 2015–2022 | 2017–2022 |
| Body | SUV | Hatchback |
| Class | SUV / crossover | No data |
| Country | No data | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better | 74 kW (101 PS) 99 hp |
| Power, all versions | 78–90 kW (106–122 PS) 105–121 hp | 74–90 kW (101–122 PS) 99–121 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 132 Nm 97 lb-ft |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,800 cc 1.8 l | 1,400 cc 1.4 l |
| Engine code | No data | G4LC |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,165 mm 164.0 in | No data |
| Width | 1,765 mm 69.5 in | No data |
| Height | 1,572 mm 61.9 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,593 mm 102.1 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 376 l 13.3 cu ft | 390 l 13.8 cu ft Better |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).