Infiniti Q45 vs GAZ-3105: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Infiniti · 2001–2006
Q45 III (F50)
- Power
- 196–254 kW266–345 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
GAZ · 1992–1996
GAZ-3105
- Power
- 125 kW170 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.0 s
- Top speed
- 200 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,635 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Rear-wheel drive · Sedan vs Rear-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Infiniti Q45 is the older design (from 1989); GAZ-3105 arrived in 1992. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Infiniti Q45 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Infiniti Q45 | GAZ-3105 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Q45 III (F50) · 4.5 L 8 cyl Automatic (S5) · 2006 (EPA) | 3.5 · 125 kW (170 PS) |
| Production years | 2001–2006 | 1992–1996 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Japan | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 196–254 kW (266–345 PS) 263–341 hp Better | 125 kW (170 PS) 168 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 11.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 77 kW/t 93 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Engine | 4,500 cc · 8 cyl 4.5 l | 3,500 cc 3.5 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed automatic | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 5,050 mm 198.8 in |
| Width | No data | 1,980 mm 78.0 in |
| Height | No data | 1,430 mm 56.3 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,870 mm 113.0 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 13.1 l/100 km 18.0 mpg US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).