Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

ZIL-130 vs KamAZ-5320: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data — no editorial review of this pair yet.

ZIL-130

ZIL · 1962–1994

ZIL-130

D PI 112

Power
81 kW110 PS
Top speed
—
Kerb mass
4,300 kg

KamAZ-5320

KamAZ · 1976–2000

KamAZ-5320

Power
154 kW209 PS
Top speed
50 km/h
Kerb mass
—

Add a third car

In plain words

KamAZ-5320 has more power: 154 kW (209 PS) against 81 kW (110 PS) for ZIL-130. ZIL-130 is the older design (from 1962); KamAZ-5320 arrived in 1976. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the KamAZ-5320 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

ZIL-130KamAZ-5320
General
Version ZIL-157 · 81 kW (110 PS) diesel · 154 kW (209 PS)
Production years 1962–1994 1976–2000
Body Truck Truck
Class Heavy truck Heavy truck
Country Soviet Union (USSR) Soviet Union (USSR)
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp 154 kW (209 PS) 207 hp Better
Power, all versions 81–110 kW (110–150 PS) 109–148 hp 132–154 kW (179–209 PS) 177–207 hp
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. No data 50 km/h 31 mph
Power per tonne 19 kW/t 23 hp/ton calculated No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel No data Diesel
Engine 6 cyl No data
Engine code ZIL-157 No data
Drive Rear-wheel drive No data
Dimensions and weight
Length 6,675 mm 262.8 in No data
Width 2,500 mm 98.4 in No data
Height 2,400 mm 94.5 in No data
Wheelbase 3,800 mm 149.6 in No data
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 4,300 kg 9,480 lb No data
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 170 l 44.9 gal US No data

Better marks the stronger figure — only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).