KamAZ-5320 vs ZIL-130: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

KamAZ · 1976–2000

KamAZ-5320

Version

Power: 154 kW209 PS
Top speed: 50 km/h
Kerb mass: -

ZIL · 1962–1994

ZIL-130

D PI 112

Version (4 versions)

Power: 81 kW110 PS
Top speed: -
Kerb mass: 4,300 kg

Add a third car

In plain words

KamAZ-5320 has more power: 154 kW (209 PS) against 81 kW (110 PS) for ZIL-130. ZIL-130 is the older design (from 1962); KamAZ-5320 arrived in 1976. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the KamAZ-5320 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

General
	KamAZ-5320	ZIL-130
Version	diesel · 154 kW (209 PS)	ZIL-157 · 81 kW (110 PS)
Production years	1976–2000	1962–1994
Body	Truck	Truck
Class	Heavy truck	Heavy truck
Country	Soviet Union (USSR)	Soviet Union (USSR)
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	154 kW (209 PS) 207 hp Better	81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp
Power, all versions	132–154 kW (179–209 PS) 177–207 hp	81–110 kW (110–150 PS) 109–148 hp
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it.	50 km/h 31 mph	No data
Power per tonne	No data	19 kW/t 23 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Diesel	No data
Engine	No data	6 cyl
Engine code	No data	ZIL-157
Drive	No data	Rear-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length	No data	6,675 mm 262.8 in
Width	No data	2,500 mm 98.4 in
Height	No data	2,400 mm 94.5 in
Wheelbase	No data	3,800 mm 149.6 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy.	No data	4,300 kg 9,480 lb
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops.	No data	170 l 44.9 gal US

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).