Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mitsubishi Outlander CU vs Mazda CX-5 KE: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width CX-5 KE 90 mm4 in wider
  • Height About the same height
  • Boot CX-5 KE 101 L3.6 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Outlander CU Mitsubishi · 2001–2006 · SUV Outlander CU 4,550 × 1,750 × 1,670 mm14 ft 11 in × 5 ft 9 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

CX-5 KE Mazda · 2012–2017 · SUV CX-5 KE 4,555 × 1,840 × 1,670 mm14 ft 11 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 6 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Outlander CU
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: CX-5 KE
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,625 mmWheelbase 8 ft 7 inLength 4,550 mmLength 14 ft 11 in1,670 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,700 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,555 mmLength 14 ft 11 in1,670 mm5 ft 6 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Outlander CU is 5 mm0.2 in shorter, 90 mm4 in narrower and the same height than the CX-5 KE. Its wheelbase is 75 mm3 in shorter.

DimensionOutlander CUCX-5 KEDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,550 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,550 mm4,555 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,555 mm −5 mm−0.2 in −0.1%
Width1,750 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,750 mm1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm −90 mm−4 in −4.9%
Height1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm Same
Wheelbase2,625 mm8 ft 7 in8 ft 7 in2,625 mm2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm −75 mm−3 in −2.8%
Footprint7.96 m²85.7 sq ft85.7 sq ft7.96 m²8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² −0.42 m²−4.5 sq ft −5.0%
Boot402 L14.2 cu ft14.2 cu ft402 L503 L17.8 cu ft17.8 cu ft503 L −101 L−3.6 cu ft −20.1%
Kerb weight1,515 kg3,340 lb3,340 lb1,515 kg1,390–1,550 kg3,064–3,417 lb3,064–3,417 lb1,390–1,550 kg +125 kg+276 lb +9.0%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Outlander CU

Single garage
Fits 950 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 625 mm2 ft 1 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 375 mm1 ft 3 in each side

CX-5 KE

Single garage
Tight 945 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 445 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander CU or the Mazda CX-5 KE?

The Mazda CX-5 KE is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander CU is 5 mm shorter, 90 mm narrower and the same height than the CX-5 KE. Its wheelbase is 75 mm shorter.

Will the Mitsubishi Outlander CU and the Mazda CX-5 KE fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander CU fits with room to open the doors (950 mm to spare in length, 625 mm each side). The Mazda CX-5 KE fits, but it is tight to get out (945 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mazda CX-5 KE: 503 L against 402 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander CU (seats up, as quoted by the maker).