Size comparison · drawn to scale
Nissan X-Trail T33 vs Toyota bZ4X EAM1: size comparison
- Length bZ4X EAM1 10 mm0.4 in longer
- Width bZ4X EAM1 20 mm0.8 in wider
- Height X-Trail T33 70 mm3 in taller
- Boot X-Trail T33 108 L3.8 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline

Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The X-Trail T33 is 10 mm0.4 in shorter, 20 mm0.8 in narrower and 70 mm3 in taller than the bZ4X EAM1. Its wheelbase is 145 mm6 in shorter.
| Dimension | X-Trail T33 | bZ4X EAM1 | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm | 4,690 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,690 mm | −10 mm−0.4 in −0.2% |
| Width | 1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm | 1,860 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,860 mm | −20 mm−0.8 in −1.1% |
| Height | 1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm | 1,650 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,650 mm | +70 mm+3 in +4.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm | 2,850 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,850 mm | −145 mm−6 in −5.1% |
| Footprint | 8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m² | 8.72 m²93.9 sq ft93.9 sq ft8.72 m² | −0.11 m²−1.2 sq ft −1.3% |
| Boot | 560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L | 452 L16.0 cu ft16.0 cu ft452 L | +108 L+3.8 cu ft +23.9% |
| Kerb weight | 1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg | 2,014 kg4,440 lb4,440 lb2,014 kg | −350 kg−772 lb −17.4% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
X-Trail T33
- Single garage
- Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side
bZ4X EAM1
- Single garage
- Tight 810 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 570 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 310 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 320 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T33 or the Toyota bZ4X EAM1?
The Toyota bZ4X EAM1 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T33 is 10 mm shorter, 20 mm narrower and 70 mm taller than the bZ4X EAM1. Its wheelbase is 145 mm shorter.
Will the Nissan X-Trail T33 and the Toyota bZ4X EAM1 fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). The Toyota bZ4X EAM1 fits, but it is tight to get out (810 mm to spare in length, 570 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 452 L in the Toyota bZ4X EAM1 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.
