Volkswagen Beetle I vs Moskvich-403: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 1938–2003
Beetle I
- Power
- 37 kW50 PS
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: dave_7 / Flickr, CC BY 2.0

Moskvich · 1962–1965
Moskvich-403
- Power
- 33 kW45 PS
- Top speed
- 115 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 900 kg
In plain words
Volkswagen Beetle I has more power: 37 kW (50 PS) against 33 kW (45 PS) for Moskvich-403. Volkswagen Beetle I is the older design (from 1938); Moskvich-403 arrived in 1962. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Volkswagen Beetle I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Beetle I | Moskvich-403 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 37 kW (50 PS) | 1.4 · petrol · 33 kW (45 PS) |
| Production years | 1938–2003 | 1962–1965 |
| Body | Sedan, Convertible | Sedan |
| Country | Germany | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 37 kW (50 PS) 50 hp Better | 33 kW (45 PS) 44 hp |
| Power, all versions | 9–37 kW (12–50 PS) 12–50 hp | 33–37 kW (45–50 PS) 44–50 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 98 Nm 72 lb-ft Better | 88 Nm 65 lb-ft |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 115 km/h 71 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 37 kW/t 45 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,360 cc · 4 cyl 1.4 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 4-speed manual |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,040 mm 159.1 in |
| Width | No data | 1,540 mm 60.6 in |
| Height | No data | 1,600 mm 63.0 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,380 mm 93.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 900 kg 1,984 lb |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 35 l 9.2 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).