Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Volkswagen Beetle I vs Moskvich-400: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen Beetle I

Volkswagen · 1938–2003

Beetle I

Power
18 kW24 PS
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
-

Photo: dave_7 / Flickr, CC BY 2.0
Moskvich-400

Moskvich · 1946–1956

Moskvich-400

Power
17–19 kW23–26 PS
Top speed
90 km/h
Kerb mass
850 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: Meccano.Cat / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

In plain words

Volkswagen Beetle I is the older design (from 1938); Moskvich-400 arrived in 1946. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Volkswagen Beetle I yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

Volkswagen Beetle IMoskvich-400
General
Version petrol · 18 kW (24 PS) 1.1 · petrol
Production years 1938–2003 1946–1956
Body Sedan, Convertible Sedan, Convertible
Country Germany Soviet Union (USSR)
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 18 kW (24 PS) 24 hp 17–19 kW (23–26 PS) 23–25 hp Better
Power, all versions 9–37 kW (12–50 PS) 12–50 hp 17–19 kW (23–26 PS) 23–25 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 55 Nm 41 lb-ft
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. No data 90 km/h 56 mph
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 4 cyl 1,074 cc · 4 cyl 1.1 l
Gearbox No data 3-speed manual
Drive Front-wheel drive Rear-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length No data 3,855 mm 151.8 in
Width No data 1,400 mm 55.1 in
Height No data 1,555 mm 61.2 in
Wheelbase No data 2,340 mm 92.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. No data 850 kg 1,874 lb
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. No data 31 l 8.2 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 9.0 l/100 km 26.1 mpg US
Fuel cost per year No data €2,360/year estimated
Range on a full tank No data 344 km 214 mi estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.

Photo credits