Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129 vs Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mercedes-Benz · 1989–2001
SL-Class R129
- Power
- 142 kW193 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.3 s
- Top speed
- 225 km/h

Mercedes-Benz · 1992–1999
CL 600 C140
- Power
- 290 kW394 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 6.1 s
- Top speed
- 250 km/h
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: SL-Class R129 1 CL 600 C140 1
- City SL-Class R129 Length: 4,499 mm vs 5,065 mm; Width: 1,811 mm vs 1,895 mm
- Performance CL 600 C140 0–100 km/h: 6.1 s vs 9.3 s
In plain words
Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 6.1 s against 9.3 s for Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129. Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140 is 566 mm longer than Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129 (5,065 mm vs 4,499 mm). Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129 is the older design (from 1989); Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140 arrived in 1992. On the catalog figures, the Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129 is the pick for city; the Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140 is the pick for performance.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | SL-Class R129 | CL 600 C140 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | B · 524 | A · 614 |
| Power | 35 | 52 |
| Grip | 43 | 48 |
| Handling | 84 | 77 |
| Top speed | 48 | 58 |
| Launch | 35 | 55 |
| Reliability | 82 | 81 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 CL 600 C140600 SEC / CL 600 · petrol · 290 kW (394 PS) 14.47 sat 160 km/h
- 2 SL-Class R129SL 280 · petrol · 142 kW (193 PS) 16.55 sat 132 km/h · +2.08 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| SL-Class R129 | CL 600 C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,499 mm177.1 in † | 5,065 mm199.4 in +566 mm +22.3 in +12.6% |
| Width | 1,811 mm71.3 in | 1,895 mm74.6 in +84 mm +3.3 in +4.6% |
| Height | 1,303 mm51.3 in | 1,427 mm56.2 in +124 mm +4.9 in +9.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,515 mm99.0 in | 2,944 mm115.9 in +429 mm +16.9 in +17.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Too long |
Difference vs SL-Class R129 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Mercedes-Benz SL-Class R129 | Mercedes-Benz CL 600 C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | SL 280 · petrol · 142 kW (193 PS) | 600 SEC / CL 600 · petrol · 290 kW (394 PS) |
| Production years | 1989–2001 | 1992–1999 |
| Body | Roadster | Coupe |
| Country | Germany | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 142 kW (193 PS) 190 hp | 290 kW (394 PS) 389 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 140–386 kW (190–525 PS) 188–518 hp | 290 kW (394 PS) 389 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft Better |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 9.3 s | 6.1 s Better |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 225 km/h 140 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 6 cyl | 6,000 cc · 12 cyl 6.0 l |
| Engine code | M104 | M120 |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,499 mm 177.1 in † | 5,065 mm 199.4 in |
| Width | 1,811 mm 71.3 in | 1,895 mm 74.6 in |
| Height | 1,303 mm 51.3 in | 1,427 mm 56.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,515 mm 99.0 in | 2,944 mm 115.9 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 265 l 9.4 cu ft † | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.