Renault Kangoo III vs Renault Austral RHN: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2021–present
Kangoo III
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 55–96 kW75–131 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Renault · 2022–present
Austral RHN
- Power
- 147 kW200 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 8.4 s
- Top speed
- 180 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,685 kg
In plain words
Renault Kangoo III is the older design (from 2021); Renault Austral RHN arrived in 2022. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Renault Kangoo III yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Renault Kangoo III | Renault Austral RHN | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | No data | E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 · 147 kW (200 PS) |
| Production years | 2021–present | 2022–present |
| Body | Minivan / MPV, Van | Crossover |
| Class | Van | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | France |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 55–96 kW (75–131 PS) 74–129 hp | 147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 55–96 kW (75–131 PS) 74–129 hp | 97–149 kW (132–203 PS) 130–200 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 8.4 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 180 km/h 112 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 87 kW/t 106 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Hybrid |
| Engine | No data | 3 cyl |
| Gearbox | No data | 6-speed automatic |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,533 mm 178.5 in |
| Width | No data | 1,825 mm 71.9 in |
| Height | No data | 1,645 mm 64.8 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,667 mm 105.0 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 527 l 18.6 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 55 l 14.5 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 4.8 l/100 km 49.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 109 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,260/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 1,146 km 712 mi estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2021) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.