Audi 80 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Audi · 1991–1995
80 B4
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.6 s
- Top speed
- 201 km/h
- Kerb mass
- -

Mercedes-Benz · 2021–present
C-Class W206
- Power
- 150 kW204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,650 kg
In plain words
Mercedes-Benz C-Class has more power: 150 kW (204 PS) against 103 kW (140 PS) for Audi 80. Audi 80 is the older design (from 1966); Mercedes-Benz C-Class arrived in 1993. Mercedes-Benz C-Class is still in production; Audi 80 is not. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Mercedes-Benz C-Class yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | 80 B4 | C-Class W206 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | B · 513 | B · 563 |
| Power | 33 | 47 |
| Grip | 57 | 47 |
| Handling | 75 | 65 |
| Top speed | 39 | 54 |
| Launch | 34 | 48 |
| Reliability | 81 | - |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 C-Class W206C-Class W206 · C 200 · petrol · 150 kW (204 PS) 15.12 sat 148 km/h
- 2 80 B480 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) 16.69 sat 128 km/h · +1.57 s
Full specifications
| Audi 80 | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 80 B4 · 2.0 ACE · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) | C-Class W206 · C 200 · petrol · 150 kW (204 PS) |
| Production years | 1991–1995 | 2021–present |
| Body | Sedan, Station wagon | Sedan |
| Country | Germany | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp | 150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 40–128 kW (54–174 PS) 54–172 hp | 55–270 kW (75–367 PS) 74–362 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 9.6 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 201 km/h 125 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 91 kW/t 111 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l | 1,496 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l |
| Engine code | ACE | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,751 mm 187.0 in |
| Width | No data | 1,820 mm 71.7 in |
| Height | No data | 1,438 mm 56.6 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,865 mm 112.8 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 455 l 16.1 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 50 l 13.2 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 6.5 l/100 km 36.2 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 147 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,710/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 769 km 478 mi estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2022) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.